<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Units of Measurement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.dingogames.com/units-of-measurement/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.dingogames.com/units-of-measurement</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 07:46:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lennonluiz</title>
		<link>http://blog.dingogames.com/units-of-measurement/comment-page-1#comment-1591</link>
		<dc:creator>lennonluiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 19:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dingogames.com/?p=102#comment-1591</guid>
		<description>maybe the unimeter(universe) on the last section should be 1000 yottameters, resumed approximate size of the universe(approx. 930.000.000.000.000.000.000.000 kilometers, or 930 yottameters).
supermeter should be before megameter(so kilometer?)
ultrameter should be after megameter, before gigameter also.
suprameter is in a macroverse. the substitution of zettameter maybe.
macrometer(why i said that?) may be the substitution of yottameter.
also:
yottameter: 1000 zettameters
zettameter: 1000 exameters
exameter: 1000 petameters(or 110 light years, approx 30 parsecs)
petameter: 1000 terameters(approx 6500 astronomical units)
terameter: 1000 gigameters.
lesson and idea swarm ended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe the unimeter(universe) on the last section should be 1000 yottameters, resumed approximate size of the universe(approx. 930.000.000.000.000.000.000.000 kilometers, or 930 yottameters).<br />
supermeter should be before megameter(so kilometer?)<br />
ultrameter should be after megameter, before gigameter also.<br />
suprameter is in a macroverse. the substitution of zettameter maybe.<br />
macrometer(why i said that?) may be the substitution of yottameter.<br />
also:<br />
yottameter: 1000 zettameters<br />
zettameter: 1000 exameters<br />
exameter: 1000 petameters(or 110 light years, approx 30 parsecs)<br />
petameter: 1000 terameters(approx 6500 astronomical units)<br />
terameter: 1000 gigameters.<br />
lesson and idea swarm ended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blog.dingogames.com/units-of-measurement/comment-page-1#comment-1132</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 03:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dingogames.com/?p=102#comment-1132</guid>
		<description>@David: One thousand</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David: One thousand</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://blog.dingogames.com/units-of-measurement/comment-page-1#comment-1130</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 18:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dingogames.com/?p=102#comment-1130</guid>
		<description>how many astronimical units in a kilo astronimical unit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how many astronimical units in a kilo astronimical unit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blog.dingogames.com/units-of-measurement/comment-page-1#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 22:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dingogames.com/?p=102#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Of course you can always make up your own units of measurement if you want something smaller... Turns out that the Jamesometer (abreviated &quot;jam&quot;) is 10^-36, or about 16 times smaller than a planck length.

There&#039;s an article about non standard unit prefixes on wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-SI_unit_prefixes
My favourite one is the prefix &quot;tiny&quot;, abbreviated &quot;ti&quot;. So if you had a tinymeter the abbreviation would be &quot;tim&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course you can always make up your own units of measurement if you want something smaller&#8230; Turns out that the Jamesometer (abreviated &#8220;jam&#8221;) is 10^-36, or about 16 times smaller than a planck length.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s an article about non standard unit prefixes on wikipedia: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-SI_unit_prefixes" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-SI_unit_prefixes</a><br />
My favourite one is the prefix &#8220;tiny&#8221;, abbreviated &#8220;ti&#8221;. So if you had a tinymeter the abbreviation would be &#8220;tim&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iramatak</title>
		<link>http://blog.dingogames.com/units-of-measurement/comment-page-1#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Iramatak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 19:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dingogames.com/?p=102#comment-59</guid>
		<description>diameter, not radius of a black hole. Sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>diameter, not radius of a black hole. Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iramatak</title>
		<link>http://blog.dingogames.com/units-of-measurement/comment-page-1#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Iramatak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 19:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dingogames.com/?p=102#comment-58</guid>
		<description>Actually, there are several things smaller than picometers. Some of the tiniest are the yoctometer, which is 10^-24 meters, and is 1 billion times smaller than a proton, and a planck, which is the only unit of measrement smaller than that. It is 100 billion times smaller than a yoctometer, or about 10^-35 meters. The radius of a black hole is thought to be 1 planck. Strings in the string theory are also approx. 1 planck.

Science lesson over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, there are several things smaller than picometers. Some of the tiniest are the yoctometer, which is 10^-24 meters, and is 1 billion times smaller than a proton, and a planck, which is the only unit of measrement smaller than that. It is 100 billion times smaller than a yoctometer, or about 10^-35 meters. The radius of a black hole is thought to be 1 planck. Strings in the string theory are also approx. 1 planck.</p>
<p>Science lesson over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendi</title>
		<link>http://blog.dingogames.com/units-of-measurement/comment-page-1#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 01:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dingogames.com/?p=102#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Nice, nice, and quite fascinating. Though, I wonder if a term will be devised for things even smaller than picometers, or something bigger than exparsec? There is an infinate level of space to anything if one thinks about it hard enough.

I.E: Take a look at a strand of hair. Pretty thin, but if we were to take an atom and expand it to our size, get someone to stand on the nucleus...the distance between the electrons and the center would be miles apart! Just as the universe, everything is actually stakced on top of everything else really, in the terms of space and it&#039;s size, yet, because if our size, it seems they would be far apart.

Philosophy can do weird, yet amazig things to one&#039;s mind!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice, nice, and quite fascinating. Though, I wonder if a term will be devised for things even smaller than picometers, or something bigger than exparsec? There is an infinate level of space to anything if one thinks about it hard enough.</p>
<p>I.E: Take a look at a strand of hair. Pretty thin, but if we were to take an atom and expand it to our size, get someone to stand on the nucleus&#8230;the distance between the electrons and the center would be miles apart! Just as the universe, everything is actually stakced on top of everything else really, in the terms of space and it&#8217;s size, yet, because if our size, it seems they would be far apart.</p>
<p>Philosophy can do weird, yet amazig things to one&#8217;s mind!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blog.dingogames.com/units-of-measurement/comment-page-1#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dingogames.com/?p=102#comment-34</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m actually not sure how many of those units we&#039;re going to use. That&#039;s just the table of units that I put in the game. For example, scientists estimate that the entire universe is 8.8x10^26 meters, or 28 gigaparsecs. So we&#039;re probably not going to go into using units bigger than gigaparsecs. I&#039;m not sure how small we&#039;re going to go. The focus will definitely be on things that are of a scale that humans are better able to imagine (millimeters to kilometers), with less levels that take place in the two extremes.

We don&#039;t have any consumable liquids yet. We can represent liquids using the standard object system that we use, but we&#039;re not going to have any kind of special liquid objects that behave like real fluids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m actually not sure how many of those units we&#8217;re going to use. That&#8217;s just the table of units that I put in the game. For example, scientists estimate that the entire universe is 8.8&#215;10^26 meters, or 28 gigaparsecs. So we&#8217;re probably not going to go into using units bigger than gigaparsecs. I&#8217;m not sure how small we&#8217;re going to go. The focus will definitely be on things that are of a scale that humans are better able to imagine (millimeters to kilometers), with less levels that take place in the two extremes.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t have any consumable liquids yet. We can represent liquids using the standard object system that we use, but we&#8217;re not going to have any kind of special liquid objects that behave like real fluids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strawberry</title>
		<link>http://blog.dingogames.com/units-of-measurement/comment-page-1#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Strawberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 20:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dingogames.com/?p=102#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Wow! We will start really small! I wonder what we can eat at that size...
Also, I have a question. Will the grey goo be able to absorb liquids? Like if there was ink on a table and the grey goo started absorbing it and getting bigger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! We will start really small! I wonder what we can eat at that size&#8230;<br />
Also, I have a question. Will the grey goo be able to absorb liquids? Like if there was ink on a table and the grey goo started absorbing it and getting bigger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iramatak</title>
		<link>http://blog.dingogames.com/units-of-measurement/comment-page-1#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Iramatak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dingogames.com/?p=102#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Just a quick note, quite a few players will have played the katamari games, and that uses the metric system.

Also, I was clueless scale-wise when it got to parsecs.

Keep up the awesomeness!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick note, quite a few players will have played the katamari games, and that uses the metric system.</p>
<p>Also, I was clueless scale-wise when it got to parsecs.</p>
<p>Keep up the awesomeness!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

